<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was a single chip camera, plastic plant &amp; rickety chair ever adequate public access?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sethmobley.com/blog/2009/11/18/was-a-single-chip-camera-plastic-plant-rickety-chair-ever-adequate-public-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sethmobley.com/blog/2009/11/18/was-a-single-chip-camera-plastic-plant-rickety-chair-ever-adequate-public-access/</link>
	<description>Digital video. video art. community media. shared creative culture. peg tv. motion graphics. a bit of music. stuff that&#039;s aggravating &#38; stuff that&#039;s nice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://sethmobley.com/blog/2009/11/18/was-a-single-chip-camera-plastic-plant-rickety-chair-ever-adequate-public-access/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethmobley.com/blog/?p=55#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jackie! It is altogether unfortunate when AMO&#039;s are criticized for using web video to the benefit of their local communities. We are noticing that much of the debate is rooted in $$ and stems from equipment purchased (Playout servers, TriCaster switchers etc.) that are standard tools of the trade, that now include web streaming features. This has led some close to cable providers to suggest that AMO&#039;s are spending X amount of dollars to stream their content an activity is not directly related to cable television and therefore a mismanagement of funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jackie! It is altogether unfortunate when AMO&#8217;s are criticized for using web video to the benefit of their local communities. We are noticing that much of the debate is rooted in $$ and stems from equipment purchased (Playout servers, TriCaster switchers etc.) that are standard tools of the trade, that now include web streaming features. This has led some close to cable providers to suggest that AMO&#8217;s are spending X amount of dollars to stream their content an activity is not directly related to cable television and therefore a mismanagement of funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Hai</title>
		<link>http://sethmobley.com/blog/2009/11/18/was-a-single-chip-camera-plastic-plant-rickety-chair-ever-adequate-public-access/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Hai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethmobley.com/blog/?p=55#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Well said. I find the assertion that funds spent on web video are being mismanaged to be particularly unreasonable, considering that&#039;s an area the telcos themselves are investing heavily in. Talk about double standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I find the assertion that funds spent on web video are being mismanaged to be particularly unreasonable, considering that&#8217;s an area the telcos themselves are investing heavily in. Talk about double standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

